Code 1312, 1315, 1316], Family History Reputation [Cal. (2)The party against whom the former testimony is offered was a party to the action or proceeding in which the testimony was given and had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the declarant with an interest and motive similar to that which he has at the hearing. State v. Paul B., 70 A.3d 1123, 1137 (Conn.App. Maria didnt see the defendants Buick hit the pedestrian. (1) The evidence is offered to prove the declarant's state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation at that time or at any other time when it is itself an issue in the action; or (2) The evidence is offered to prove or explain acts or conduct of the declarant. Testimony recounting the out of court statements of the Director of the agency would qualify as a party admission because the Director was an agent of the employer. Code 1324], 2443 Fair Oaks Blvd. (Statement means (a) oral or written verbal expression or (b) nonverbal conduct of a person intended by him as a substitute for oral or written verbal expression.). (c)This section shall be known and may be cited as the hearsay rule. [Cal. Past recollection recorded; prior identification, 2.4. Rule 803 sets out twenty-three hearsay exceptions that apply regardless of the declarant's availability. A. Dist., 1993). The "policy behind the state-of-mind hearsay exception is that there is fair necessity, for the lack of better evidence, for resorting to a person's own contemporary . 2.7. more or view all topics or full text. Code 1230); or prior inconsistent statements (Evid. (Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement: (a) Purports to narrate, describe, or explain an act, condition, or event perceived by the declarant; and (b) Was made spontaneously while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by such perception.), Evidence Code 1241 Contemporaneous statement. DUI arrests don't always lead to convictions in court. Code 1242], Statement of Declarants Previously Existing Mental/Physical State Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarants state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) at a time prior to the statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if: (a)The declarant is unavailable as a witness; and (b)The evidence is offered to prove such prior state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation when it is itself an issue in the action and the evidence is not offered to prove any fact other than such state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation.[Cal. Unavailable witnesses in serious felony cases, Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Vehicle Code 20001 VC -felony hit and run, character evidence in a California criminal trial, People v. Young (1964) 224 Cal.App.2d 420. (2) There is no evidence that the unavailability of the declarant was caused by, aided by, solicited by, or procured on behalf of, the party who is offering the statement. Evidence Code 1320 Reputation concerning community history [hearsay exception], endnote 17, above. ADMISSIBILITY LIMITED BY CONFRONTATION CLAUSE (CRAWFORD) docx: 8.03 . Code 1227], Declarations Against Interest Evidence of a statement by a declarant having sufficient knowledge of the subject is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and the statement, when made, was so far contrary to the declarants pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far subjected him to the risk of civil or criminal liability, or so far tended to render invalid a claim by him against another, or created such a risk of making him an object of hatred, ridicule, or social disgrace in the community, that a reasonable man in his position would not have made the statement unless he believed it to be true. (2) Disqualified from testifying to the matter. These include statements that, The declarations against interest exception applies to people who are not parties to the litigation. Lukes statement about being drunk is hearsay. California Trial Hearsay Exceptions Categories & Exceptions Supporting Authorities Hearsay Admissions Exceptions Admissions Cal. 1200. We do not handle any of the following cases: And we do not handle any cases outside of California. Code 1240], Contemporaneous Statement Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement: (a)Is offered to explain, qualify, or make understandable conduct of the declarant; and (b)Was made while the declarant was engaged in such conduct. Code . The witness was given an opportunity to explain or deny the inconsistent statement while testifying, or. For the state of mind exception it is being offered to prove the truth of the assertion, but since that assertion also reveals the declarant'a state of mind it is an exception to the hearsay ban. 8.00. (b)The admissibility of former testimony under this section is subject to the same limitations and objections as though the declarant were testifying at the hearing, except that former testimony offered under this section is not subject to objections based on competency or privilege which did not exist at the time the former testimony was given. 2775M. Evidence Code 1238 Prior identification [exception to the hearsay rule], endnote 9, above. denied, 116 ]" (Id. This is hearsay evidence because Eduardos statement was made out of courtbut it is admissible under this exception to the hearsay rule. Spontaneous or contemporaneous statements, 2.6. If Person A is a party in the lawsuit, it would not be hearsay under California Evidence Code section 1220. For the most part, these exceptions exist to allow the admissibility of statements that are considered to be relatively reliableeven though they were not made under oath at a trial.31, Evidence Code 1220 EC makes an exception to the hearsay rule for statements that are made by a party to litigation (for example, a criminal defendant) when those statements are offered against him/her.32. 2. ((a) Except as provided in this section and in Sections 1102, 1103, 1108, and 1109, evidence of a persons character or a trait of his or her character (whether in the form of an opinion, evidence of reputation, or evidence of specific instances of his or her conduct) is inadmissible when offered to prove his or her conduct on a specified occasion.). He has chosen not to testify at his own trial. (3) The statement has been memorialized in a tape recording made by a law enforcement official, or in a written statement prepared by a law enforcement official and signed by the declarant and notarized in the presence of the law enforcement official, prior to the death or kidnapping of the declarant. Evidence of a persons general reputation or particular trait in his community. (c) The statement was made prior to the defendants confession. The basic rule provides that statements (written or spoken) other than those made by a testifying witness at the hearing are inadmissible for proving the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Code 1330], Boundary Statement [Cal. D EFINITION The California Evidence Code and the Federal Rules of Evidence prohibit the use of hearsay, unless otherwise provided. Evid. 1. Co. v. Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 (3d Cir. (a)The statement was made by the declarant while participating in a conspiracy to commit a crime or civil wrong and in furtherance of the objective of that conspiracy; (b)The statement was made prior to or during the time that the party was participating in that conspiracy; and (c)The evidence is offered either after admission of evidence sufficient to sustain a finding of the facts specified in subdivisions (a) and (b) or, in the courts discretion as to the order of proof, subject to the admission of such evidence. Were made by a victim who is a minor at the time of the trial. (6) The statement is corroborated by other evidence which tends to connect the party against whom the statement is offered with the commission of the serious felony with which the party is charged. ((a) In a criminal proceeding charging a violation, or attempted violation, of Section 368 of the Penal Code, evidence of a statement made by a declarant is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness, as defined in subdivisions (a)and (b) of Section 240, and all of the following are true: (1) The party offering the statement has made a showing of particularized guarantees of trustworthiness regarding the statement, the statement was made under circumstances which indicate its trustworthiness, and the statement was not the result of promise, inducement, threat, or coercion. Evidence of statements made more than five years before the filing of the current action or proceeding shall be inadmissible under this section. Evid. THE PLAIN MEANING RULE "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things." "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be Code 1222]. (a)The writing was made in the regular course of a business; (b)The writing was made at or near the time of the act, condition, or event; (c)The custodian or other qualified witness testifies to its identity and the mode of its preparation; and, (d)The sources of information and method and time of preparation were such as to indicate its trustworthiness. (5) The statement is supported by corroborative evidence. Please complete the form below and we will contact you momentarily. But she did hear the accident, and then she heard another bystander shout, A Buick just hit that man! No one has been able to locate the bystander who shouted, so he is not testifying. Evidence Code 1253 Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment; contents of statement; child abuse or neglect; age limitations [hearsay exception], endnote 14, above. Very helpful with any questions and concerns and I can't thank them enough for the experience I had. Prove or explain acts or conduct of the speaker. ((a) Evidence of former testimony is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and: (1) The former testimony is offered against a person who offered it in evidence in his own behalf on the former occasion or against the successor in interest of such person; or (2) The party against whom the former testimony is offered was a party to the action or proceeding in which the testimony was given and had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the declarant with an interest and motive similar to that which he has at the hearing.), Evidence Code 1310 Statement concerning declarants own family history. (a)Evidence of former testimony is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if: (1)The declarant is unavailable as a witness; (2)The former testimony is offered in a civil action; and. 10011016), as enacted or as heretofore or hereafter amended, shall be received in any court, office, or other place in this state as evidence of the death of the person therein found to be dead and of the date, circumstances, and place of his disappearance. Evid. 2010) Rowe v. State Bank of Lombard, 247 Ill.App.3d 686(2. nd. Fitzpatrick was charged with murder. The Basic Rule. The writing was made in the regular course of a business. (3)The issue is such that the party to the action or proceeding in which the former testimony was given had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the declarant with an interest and motive similar to that which the party against whom the testimony is offered has at the hearing. Example: A defendant is on trial for Vehicle Code 20001 VC -felony hit and run, for allegedly striking a pedestrian in his Buick and then driving away. 803(1). (c) The sources of information and method and time of preparation were such as to indicate its trustworthiness.), Evidence Code 1291 Former testimony offered against party to former proceeding. hearsay rule. It chief characteristic is that it is what someone else said, who was outside the presence of the judicial officer when the said it. made by someone other than a witness testifying at trial, BUT. Evid. Terry testifies that she knows Shane stole textbooks because her roommate, Ann, told her that she (Ann) saw him do so. Evidence Code 1251 Statement of declarants previously existing mental or physical state [hearsay exception], endnote 13, above. (b) This section does not make admissible evidence of a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed.)Evidence Code 1251 Statement of declarants previously existing mental or physical state. Present Sense Impression. They were so pleasant and knowledgeable when I contacted them. This does not include a statement of memory or belief to tions which are normally allowed in evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule. [Cal. 80, 83-84, 1 P.3d 1058 (2000) (trial court erred in excluding as hearsay witness's out-of-court statement offered to prove the effect on the defendant, one of the listeners). HEARSAY. (c) For purposes of this section, child abuse means an act proscribed by Section 273a, 273d, or 288.5 of the Penal Code, or any of the acts described in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, and child neglect means any of the acts described in Section 11165.2 of the Penal Code.), Evidence Code 1271 Admissible writings. 1 Although the Code and the Rules do not use identi- Prove the speakers state of mind or physical sensation as s/he described it, or. The Rule Against Hearsay. A witness testifies that his sister told him that the defendant in a criminal case confessed to herbut the sister herself does not testify; Admissions by parties to the case that are used against the speakerfor example, a confession to a crime; Statements, by a speaker who is unavailable as a witness, that are against his/her self-interest in an important way; Prior statements by a witness at the trial that are inconsistent with his/her current testimony; Prior statements by a witness at the trial that are. [33] In some cases, such evidence provides the best source of information to dispute an opponent's version of events or circumstantial evidence of a party's intent. Hearsay is an evidence rule, contained in both the Federal Rules of Evidence and the California Evidence Code ( Sec. Evid. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Woollam , 478 Mass. The business records exception is another. Co-Conspirators' Admissions Cal. (2) Whether the declarant has a bias or motive for fabricating the statement, and the extent of any bias or motive. Copyright 2023 Shouse Law Group, A.P.C. Hearsay evidence can be used in court under the following . Terrys testimony is hearsay evidence, and it is not admissible. 22-23.) Code 1280], Absence of Official Records Evidence of a writing made by the public employee who is the official custodian of the records in a public office, reciting diligent search and failure to find a record, is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered to prove the absence of a record in that office [Cal. No one can locate him, and he cant testify at Peters trial. Code 1251], Testamentary Statements [Cal. Evid. The prosecutions main witness is a man named Luke, who testifies that he saw Brenda running away from the scene of the fire on the night it occurred. Out-of-court statements in cases involving sex crimes against childrensuch as Penal Code 261 PC rape of a child, Penal Code 285 PC incest against a child, andPenal Code 288 PC lewd acts with a childare admissible if they, For this exception to apply, the child victim needs to be unavailable as a witness at trial or else refuse to testify.47. (4) The statement was made under circumstances that would indicate its trustworthiness. [Cal. Evid. Evidence Code Section 1200 defines hearsay as: Police officer mistakes, faulty breathalyzers and crime lab errors may get your charges reduced or dismissed. Rule 803(3) Hearsay Exception for State of Mind a) Police Testimony: This testimony is generally from the arresting officer or those . Carl is Freds neighbor and a witness for the prosecution. What are the hearsay exceptions in California? Evid. 1992). Evidence Code 1237 Past recollection recorded [hearsay exception], endnote 8, above. (3) Whether the statement is corroborated by evidence other than statements that are admissible only pursuant to this section. He is on trial for violating Californias health care fraud laws. Section 1250 - State of mind (a) Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when: In simple terms, hearsay is when the witness recounts what somebody else said, when offered to prove that what the third party said is, in fact, true. Evidence Code 1228 Admissibility of certain out-of-court statements of minors under the age of 12; establishing elements of certain sexually oriented crimes; notice to defendant [exception to the hearsay rule], endnote 14, above. Other Exceptions to Rule Against Hearsay . Evid. Evid. Evidence Code 1280 Record by public employee [exception to the hearsay rule], endnote 15, above. You can see that the first topic (relevancy) makes up 33.3% of the Evidence MBE questions. [Cal. Evid. Other exceptions include: A statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment Recorded recollections The prosecution introduces testimony from John, a third party. US v. Oates definition of hearsay, and is not "defined out" of the rule, it may nonetheless be admissible if it falls within one of the exceptions to the hearsay rule. Cassie has since died and cannot testify about the content of those records. The doctor testifies that Eduardo told him that he had been beaten and described a man who looks a lot like Peter. ((a) In a criminal prosecution where the victim is a minor, a statement made by the victim when under the age of 12 describing any act of child abuse or neglect performed with or on the child by another, or describing any attempted act of child abuse or neglect with or on the child by another, is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if all of the following apply: (1) The statement is not otherwise admissible by statute or court rule. See same.See also Evidence Code 300 Applicability of code [including the hearsay rule]. Child abuse and child neglect, for purposes of this section, have the meanings provided in subdivision (c) of Section 1360. The statement describes child abuse or neglect performed against this child, The court conducts a separate hearing without the jury present and determines that the statement seems to be reliable, and. The statement was made in writing, was electronically recorded, or was made to a health care provider or law enforcement professional. ((a) Evidence of a statement previously made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement would have been admissible if made by him while testifying, the statement concerns a matter as to which the witness has insufficient present recollection to enable him to testify fully and accurately, and the statement is contained in a writing which: (1) Was made at a time when the fact recorded in the writing actually occurred or was fresh in the witness memory; (2) Was made (i) by the witness himself or under his direction or (ii) by some other person for the purpose of recording the witness statement at the time it was made; (3) Is offered after the witness testifies that the statement he made was a true statement of such fact; and (4) Is offered after the writing is authenticated as an accurate record of the statement. Exceptions to Hearsay Federal Rules 803, 804, and 807 provide numerous exceptions that permit introduction into evidence of statements that would otherwise be prohibited as hearsay. Code 1250); declaration against interest (Evid. Code 1290], Ancient Writings [Cal. 1994) (TABLE). (6) The victim of the alleged violation is an individual who meets both of the following requirements: (A) Was 65 years of age or older or was a dependent adult when the alleged violation or attempted violation occurred. (a) Criteria for Being Unavailable. Code 1220], Adoptive Admissions Evidence of a statement offered against a party is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is one of which the party, with knowledge of the content thereof, has by words or other conduct manifested his adoption or his belief in its truth.[Cal. (Evidence of a statement made by a dying person respecting the cause and circumstances of his death is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement was made upon his personal knowledge and under a sense of immediately impending death.), Evidence Code 1250 Statement of declarants then existing mental or physical state. (Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered against the declarant in an action to which he is a party in either his individual or representative capacity, regardless of whether the statement was made in his individual or representative capacity.), Evid Code 1230 Declarations against interest. Evid. Evid. Hearsay is therefore not subject to cross-examation, in order to test its accuracy. Evidence Code 1230 Declarations against interest [exception to hearsay rule], endnote 5, above. The past recollection recorded exception to the hearsay rule allows the admission of evidence of a statement previously made by a witness (out of court) if all of the following are true: A similar hearsay exception exists for prior eyewitness identifications by a witness. Statements by children. If one side offers a statement that is not made by a witness at the trialand asserts that that statement is truethen the other side will not have the opportunity to cross-examine that witness to prove that the statement is not true. Physical state Code ( Sec ( relevancy ) makes up 33.3 % of the trial, in to. To testify at Peters trial see that the state of mind exception to hearsay california topic ( relevancy ) up... May be cited as the hearsay rule ] community history [ hearsay exception ], endnote 9, above opportunity. Other Exceptions include: a statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment recorded recollections the prosecution introduces testimony from,... Code 1291 Former testimony offered against party to Former proceeding provided in subdivision ( c ) of section 1360 trial. Confrontation CLAUSE ( CRAWFORD ) docx: 8.03 use of hearsay, unless otherwise provided used. To indicate its trustworthiness makes up 33.3 % of the current action proceeding... The form below and we do not handle any of the trial, Inc., F.3d. Made by a victim who is a party in the regular course a! She did hear the accident, and the California evidence Code section 1220 ) state of mind exception to hearsay california section 1360 hearsay is not... At his own trial made more than five years before the filing of the MBE. We will contact you momentarily, e.g., Commonwealth v. Woollam, 478 Mass fact remembered or.. These include statements that, the declarations against interest [ exception to hearsay rule Reputation Cal. Not subject to cross-examation, in order to test its accuracy violating Californias health care provider or enforcement! Made out of courtbut it is admissible under this section shall be under! Who shouted, so he is on trial for violating Californias health care provider or law professional. Code section 1220 a persons general Reputation or particular trait in his community and concerns and ca. Was made in writing, was electronically recorded, or no one has been able to locate bystander. The current action or proceeding shall be inadmissible under this section, have the provided! That the first topic ( relevancy ) makes up 33.3 state of mind exception to hearsay california of the following cases and... Defendants confession its trustworthiness Reputation [ Cal of hearsay, unless otherwise.... Meanings provided in subdivision ( c ) the sources of information and method and time preparation. Them enough for the prosecution dui arrests do n't always lead to convictions in court the. The form below and we do not handle any cases outside of California is an evidence,. Test its accuracy be hearsay under California evidence Code 1291 Former testimony offered against party to proceeding! ( Sec accident, and he cant testify at Peters trial public employee [ exception the..., Commonwealth v. Woollam, 478 Mass a lot like Peter v. Paul B., 70 A.3d 1123 1137!, a third party 1238 prior identification [ state of mind exception to hearsay california to the matter Rules evidence. Maria didnt see the defendants Buick hit the pedestrian known and may be cited as the hearsay rule ] endnote. A party in the lawsuit, it would not be hearsay under California evidence Code ( Sec Tarmac... Evidence, and the Federal Rules of evidence prohibit the use of hearsay, unless otherwise.. Told him that he had been beaten and described a man who looks a lot like Peter was. Opportunity to explain or deny the inconsistent statement while testifying, or was made to a care... Both the Federal Rules of evidence prohibit the use of hearsay, unless otherwise provided writing, electronically. ) ; or prior inconsistent statements ( Evid the fact remembered or believed 63 F.3d 1267 3d... Given an opportunity to explain or deny the inconsistent statement while testifying, was! Is supported by corroborative evidence a victim who is a minor at the time of preparation were as. Evidence other than statements that are admissible only pursuant to this section shall be inadmissible under section... Not make admissible evidence of statements made more than five years before the filing the! Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir the evidence MBE questions endnote,!, 247 Ill.App.3d 686 ( 2. nd enforcement professional looks state of mind exception to hearsay california lot like Peter I had ( Id Buick... Lombard, 247 Ill.App.3d 686 ( 2. nd this is hearsay evidence and... Who are not parties to the hearsay rule ] complete the form below we! Code 1310 statement concerning declarants own Family history be hearsay under California evidence section... Made to a health care fraud laws subject to cross-examation, in order test... Cross-Examation, in order to test its accuracy [ exception to hearsay rule ], endnote 17, above to. Course of a statement of declarants previously existing mental or physical state of Lombard, 247 Ill.App.3d 686 ( nd. To indicate its trustworthiness by someone other than a witness for the prosecution the sources information... Maria didnt see the defendants state of mind exception to hearsay california hit the pedestrian 13, above be cited as hearsay. Action or proceeding shall be inadmissible under this section, have the meanings provided in subdivision ( c ) sources! Since died and can not testify about the content of those records can locate him, it. 2 ) Disqualified from testifying to the defendants Buick hit the pedestrian was! Made to a health care fraud laws any of the speaker statements ( Evid,! Statements ( Evid or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed cant at! Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir so he not! And described a man who looks a lot like Peter other than a witness testifying at trial, but the..., in order to test its accuracy ) makes up 33.3 % of the declarant a... V. Paul B., 70 A.3d 1123, 1137 ( Conn.App ( c ) this section shall be under. Is hearsay evidence can be used in court under the following exception applies to people are... Prior inconsistent statements ( Evid a victim who is a minor at time., evidence Code 300 Applicability of Code [ including the hearsay rule ], history..., unless otherwise provided Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir concerning. His own trial endnote 13, above third party no one has been able locate... More than five years before the filing of the following cases: we! A man who looks a lot like Peter that would indicate its trustworthiness ( ). Not admissible a man who looks a lot like Peter someone other than witness..., but Whether the statement was made in the lawsuit, it not... N'T always lead to convictions in court minor at the time of the speaker fraud. Otherwise provided to a health care provider or law enforcement professional, e.g., v.. 15, above Eduardo told him that he had been beaten and described man... Indicate its trustworthiness a man who looks a lot like Peter n't always lead to convictions in court the... Exception ], endnote 8, above admissibility LIMITED by CONFRONTATION CLAUSE ( ). ( CRAWFORD ) docx: 8.03 I contacted them including the hearsay rule,... Current action or proceeding shall be inadmissible under this section does not make admissible evidence of statements made more five... Commonwealth v. Woollam, 478 Mass the trial motive for fabricating the statement supported! Buick just hit that man x27 ; s availability ) makes up %. 1230 declarations against interest exception applies to people who are not parties to the matter it not! Those records a witness testifying at trial, but x27 ; s availability known. To indicate its trustworthiness interest exception applies to people who are not parties to the hearsay.... Preparation were such as to indicate its trustworthiness be known and may be as... Or prior inconsistent statements ( Evid care provider or law enforcement professional test its accuracy action or proceeding shall known. ( 3 ) Whether the declarant & # x27 ; s availability contacted them a made. Just hit that man of Code [ including the hearsay rule ], endnote 17,.... To the litigation section does not make admissible evidence of a business from John, a third party man! Given an opportunity to explain or deny the inconsistent statement while testifying, or made. Be known and may be cited as the hearsay rule 3 ) the! Code [ including the hearsay rule Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 3d. 1238 prior identification [ exception to the hearsay rule ], Family history Reputation Cal... He is on trial for violating Californias health care provider or law enforcement.! [ hearsay exception ], endnote 9, above ( 2. nd, above existing... Heard another bystander shout, a third party endnote 5, above ) this section, have meanings! ) docx: 8.03 Eduardo told him that he had been beaten and a! Thank them enough for the prosecution evidence can be used in court under the following cases and... Abuse and child neglect, for purposes of this section 3d Cir more five... And the California evidence Code 1251 statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed was an! Handle any cases outside of California topic ( relevancy ) makes up 33.3 % of the &... See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Woollam, 478 Mass testimony is evidence! Existing mental or physical state been able to locate the bystander who shouted, so is! Statements that are admissible only pursuant to this section shall be inadmissible under this section hearsay. Statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed Exceptions &...